In the News
• An opinion piece in the Sunday Times carried a number of inaccuracies in relation to the CPS’ decision to charge Kevin Moore with kidnapping after he forced a child to get into his car following an earlier incident.
There are a number of misconceptions contained in the article, the most important of which are clarified below:
- The defendant did not witness the incident between the youngsters – it was drawn to his attention after the children had run back into the church. The victim was not the boy who it was alleged (but never proven) had hit another child.
- There was no ‘punch’ as described in the article. The evidence showed that one of the children was hit with a piece of fruit thrown by the younger boy accompanying the victim. The article states ‘nobody was concerned with the children’s behaviour'. This is not correct. The Police spoke to the mother of the boy hit by the fruit. She did not wish to bring charges.
- The complainant did not get into the vehicle willingly. He was pulled off his bicycle and dragged to the car before being thrown up against the side of it. Independent witnesses complained because of the nature of the assault that the defendant subsequently pleaded guilty to.
- The defendant did not make a 'citizens arrest'. There are several reports from by-standers and the youths involved that he claimed to be a policeman. The Sunday Times as well as other newspapers last week were provided with the following statement that explained what happened in this case.
Gerry Wareham, Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS Cleveland, said:
“Kevin Moore was charged with kidnapping as there was evidence that he took a 13 year old boy into his car unlawfully and by force against his will. This case was brought to the attention of Cleveland Police by two adult members of the public who were concerned at the potentially serious nature of the incident. Both witnessed the scene and one of them called the police when he found out that the boy, who seemed upset when being forced to get into the car, was not related to the defendant whose behaviour was described as aggressive.
“The defendant said that he reacted that way in relation to an earlier incident, for which the 13 year old boy was not responsible.
“After a request from the Judge that the CPS reconsider the level of charge, an offence of common assault was added to the indictment to which the defendant pleaded guilty. In light of this plea we considered whether to go ahead with the kidnapping charge and or whether to ask for the charge to lie on file. This was discussed with the police, the victim and his family who accepted the CPS’ decision that a plea to the lesser charge was acceptable. Moore was sentenced to 18 months conditional discharge and ordered to pay £250 compensation for the common assault.
“The defendant in interview accepted that members of the public who witnessed the scene thought that his actions were terrible. The prosecutor in this case made the decision based on the available evidence.
“It is important that we robustly prosecute to deter people from acting in an unlawful manner but understand the judge’s concerns in this case. We have charging guidelines which seek to ensure we do this in an open, fair and consistent manner. I will look at this case to see whether there are any lessons we need to learn.”
For background: A group of boys aged 12-14, including the victim, were shouting at each other in a church yard with some throwing apples and berries that may have hit one of the other children present. The defendant, who did not witness this incident, chased the boys throwing fruit who had cycled away. He took his car, caught up with them and grabbed one of the boys (who was not responsible for the earlier incident) and forced him into his car.
• A numbers of reports over the weekend said that the judge’s report in relation to the case of the Labour MP Phil Woolas who was found guilty of illegal practices under election law under the Representation of People Act 1983 at the Royal Courts of Justice last Friday, will be passed onto the CPS. At this stage we have not received any file or report.
• It was reported yesterday that we will soon charge an individual in relation to the abuse of Parliamentary expenses. We are not considering any outstanding files of evidence in relation to Parliamentary expenses, so there are no imminent charging decisions. Questions about any ongoing investigations should be directed to the Metropolitan Police.
• The sentencing of Bernadette Quirk who pleaded guilty to four counts of concealing the birth of her children has been postponed to December, the date has not been confirmed yet. A statement will be released on sentencing.