CPS News Brief

Gross negligence manslaughter charge over death of cricket ground worker

Zoe Martin, Specialist Prosecutor in the CPS Special Crime Division, said:

“I have carefully considered all the available evidence in relation to the tragic death of Philip Carsley, who died on 8 February 2010 when a concrete wall fell on him during the construction of two new spectator stands at the Rose Bowl, now the Ageas Bowl, Cricket Ground in Hampshire.

“I have now concluded there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest to charge Ian Gould, director of Prefix Limited, the company contracted to install concrete units in the ground, with gross negligence manslaughter and two offences contrary to section 33 of the Health and Safety at Work Act.

“I have also concluded that there is sufficient evidence and it is in the public interest to charge Andrew Scott Limited, the company project-managing the construction of the spectator stands, with two offences contrary to section 33 of the Health and Safety at Work Act.

“These decisions were taken in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors. “Ian Gould and Andrew Scott Limited have now been summonsed to appear at West Hampshire Magistrates’ Court on 3 July 2013.

“I extend my sympathies to the family of Philip Carsley.”

LulzSec computer hackers jailed for a total of 7 years

Ryan Cleary, Mustafa Al-Bassam, Jake Davis and Ryan Ackroyd were sentenced today at Southwark Crown Court for offences under the Computer Misuse Act 1990.

Andrew Hadik, CPS London reviewing lawyer, said:

“The actions of these LulzSec hackers were cowardly and vindictive. The harm they caused was foreseeable, extensive and intended. Indeed, they boasted of how clever they were with a complete disregard for the impact their actions had on real people’s lives.

“Whilst aggressively protecting their own privacy and identities, they set out to hack and publish hundreds of thousands of innocent individuals’ private details. Companies also suffered serious financial and reputational damage. A senior executive of one American company lost his job and had to move his young family because of death threats.

“Coordinating and carrying out these attacks from the safety of their own bedrooms may have made the group feel detached from the consequences of their actions.

“But to say it was all a bit of fun in no way reflects the reality of their actions. They were in fact committing serious criminal offences for which they have been successfully prosecuted. This case should serve as a warning to other cyber-criminals that they are not invincible.”

Sentences:

Ryan Cleary – 32 months

Jake Davis – 24 months

Ryan Ackroyd – 30 months

Mustafa Al-Bassam – 20 months, suspended for 2 years. 200 hours of unpaid work.

Decision on file of evidence arising from Operation Weeting

Gregor McGill, a senior lawyer with the Crown Prosecution Service, whose team handles CPS decision making and potential prosecutions in relation to the on-going phone hacking investigations and other related matters, said:

"This statement is made in the interests of transparency and accountability to explain the decisions reached in respect of cases arising from Operation Weeting.

"This announcement relates to a file of evidence from the Metropolitan Police Service that was initially received by the CPS on 28 August 2012. We have since been liaising with the police regarding further lines of enquiry, which resulted in the submission of further material, most recently on 28 March 2013.

“This file was submitted to the CPS for a charging decision in relation to two individuals regarding allegations of money laundering.

“In relation to the first suspect, the CPS has decided that there is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction in relation to two allegations; further, where this stage has been passed in relation to three other allegations, a prosecution is not required in the public interest.

“Regarding the second suspect, there is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction in relation to one allegation and where this stage has been passed in relation to one other allegation, a prosecution is not required in the public interest.

“These decisions were taken in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors.

“Both suspects have now been informed that no further action will be taken in relation to these allegations.

“Due to on-going, related, proceedings it would be inappropriate to say any more at this stage. At the conclusion of any related proceedings we will consider what more can be made public in relation to this decision.

“It is very important that nothing is said, or reported, which could prejudice an upcoming trial."

Statement on Oxford grooming case

Baljit Ubhey, Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS Thames & Chiltern said: 

"The abuse these girls were subjected to was truly appalling. No-one, let alone a child, should ever be exploited as these young victims were. To all who bravely came forward to provide evidence for the prosecution, I say a heart-felt thank you. You have enabled your abusers to face trial and be brought to justice.

"The men who have been convicted have still failed to accept any responsibility for their crimes. They are nothing less than vicious sexual predators. The jury saw through their fabrications and they must now face the consequences of their actions. And I thank the jury too for their careful attention and deliberation in this case.

"The Crown Prosecution Service has made tackling child sexual abuse a national priority. And the Director of Public Prosecutions has recently announced a radical programme of work in this area to ensure that police and prosecutors deliver justice for more victims than ever before.

"In this case we worked closely with Thames Valley Police from early in the investigation to help build the strongest possible prosecution case. Their investigators and Crown Prosecution Service lawyers and caseworkers have worked tirelessly to bring this difficult prosecution to court.

"These cases are, in effect, organised crime and we approached it in the same way we would approach any organised crime case by making connections and building an understanding of perpetrator networks.

"So, to any other groups out there abusing victims in this way, I say this: you are on notice. We are becoming increasingly adept at securing convictions and delivering justice for victims.

"I urge any victims of sexual offences to come forward and report their abuse. We will support you in giving evidence so that your attackers can be brought to justice and others like you can be saved from the horrific ordeal of abuse.

"I very much hope the verdicts provide some comfort for the victims of this case and for their families, and help them to move on and rebuild their lives."

 

Operation Elveden: Clodagh Hartley, Jonathan Hall and Marta Bukarewicz are charged

Gregor McGill, a senior lawyer with the Crown Prosecution Service, whose team handles CPS decision making and potential prosecutions in relation to the on-going phone hacking investigations and other related matters, said:

"This statement is made in the interests of transparency and accountability to explain the decisions reached in respect of cases arising from Operation Elveden, which is the Metropolitan Police’s investigation into allegations involving the unlawful provision of information by public officials to journalists.

"This announcement relates to a file of evidence from the Metropolitan Police Service that was received by the CPS on 14 March 2013.

“We have concluded, following a careful review of the evidence, that Clodagh Hartley, a journalist at the Sun newspaper, Jonathan Hall, employed as a Press Officer at Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) and Marta Bukarewicz, partner of Mr Hall and not a public official, should be charged with conspiracy to commit misconduct in public office.

“It is alleged that between 30 March 2008 and 15 July 2011 The Sun newspaper paid £17,475 to Jonathan Hall, mostly via Marta Bukarewicz, in exchange for the unauthorised disclosure of information obtained as a result of his employment with HMRC.

"The information provided included details about government plans, including upcoming but as yet unannounced spending and policy decisions relating to the 2010 Budget and the coalition government’s deficit reduction plans. Information also related specifically to policy and decision-making within HMRC, including that relating to job losses and casework.

"All of these matters were considered carefully in accordance with the DPP's guidelines on the public interest in cases affecting the media. This guidance asks prosecutors to consider whether the public interest served by the conduct in question outweighs the overall criminality before bringing criminal proceedings.

"Accordingly, we have authorised the institution of proceedings and all three individuals will appear before Westminster Magistrates' Court on 29 May 2013.

"May I remind all concerned that proceedings for a criminal offence involving these three individuals will now be commenced and that each has a right to a fair trial. It is very important that nothing is said, or reported, which could prejudice that trial. For these reasons it would be inappropriate for me to comment further."

The full charge is as follows:

Between 30 March 2008 and 15 July 2011, Jonathan Hall, Marta Bukarewicz and Clodagh Hartley conspired together to commit misconduct in a public office.

CPS statement on former police officer charged with misconduct in public office

Zoe Martin, specialist prosecutor in the CPS Special Crime Division, said:

“Rebecca Swanston, a former police officer with Hampshire Constabulary, today appeared at Basingstoke Magistrates’ Court charged with three counts of misconduct in a public office.

“It is alleged that Rebecca Swanston wilfully misconducted herself by accessing and disclosing confidential police information and by failing to report information disclosed to her relating to potential criminal activity.

“Having carefully considered all the available evidence, I have concluded that is there sufficient evidence and that it is in the public interest to charge Rebecca Swanston with three counts of misconduct in public office. This decision was taken in accordance with the Code for Crown Prosecutors.

“The case has been sent to Winchester Crown Court for a preliminary hearing on 4 June.”

Stuart Hazell convicted of murder

Alison Saunders, Chief Crown Prosecutor for London, said:

“This was an appalling and unthinkable crime, made worse by Hazell’s efforts to hide Tia’s body and disrupt the police investigation. As an adult and trusted family member, he had responsibility for ensuring Tia’s safety. Instead, he abused and murdered her.

“As the details of this case unfolded in the trial, it became increasingly clear that Hazell had little choice but to plead guilty. This was a strong case, jointly prepared by the CPS and the police, and I would like to pay tribute to the prosecution and police teams.

“We recognise that this is an extremely distressing time for the family and I would like to pay tribute to them for their strength and fortitude throughout this case. I hope that this prosecution provides some small measure of comfort for them at this time.”