In the News
• Five animal rights activists were sentenced yesterday at Winchester CC for terrorising over the years linked to the Huntingdon Life Sciences firm through a campaign of threats, intimidations and violence. Following sentencing, Alastair Nisbet, senior lawyer for the CPS Complex Casework Unit in Wessex, said:
“These defendants were not legitimate animal welfare protestors but people who were prepared to carry out criminal acts, which tormented and deeply distressed their victims, sometimes over a number of years.
“They threatened and intimidated those who were going about their lawful business because they personally objected to the victims supplying goods and services to Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS).
“Those who have not been subject to such a campaign cannot understand how harrowing it is to be constantly on your guard against threatening letters and emails, vandalism to your home and car and even hoax bomb threats. Or what it’s like to have your neighbours and employers told, maliciously and repeatedly, that you are a paedophile.
“In common with the seven other animal rights extremists, who were sentenced to a total of 50 years in prison in January 2009, they were members of the discredited organisation SHAC – Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty - whose sole aim was to shut down HLS by any means necessary, regardless of the law.
“HLS carries out pharmaceutical product testing which is not only licensed and lawful, but is required by UK and European legislation. “Our society supports the right to free speech and to campaign peacefully, but where that behaviour is criminal, regardless of the perceived cause, a prosecution will almost certainly follow and, if convicted, a significant prison sentence.”
• Story of Jamie Merrett, who became brain damaged after one of the nurses who looked after him switched off his life support machine. We decided to take no further action against the nurse at the time. We issued the following statement:
“The Crown Prosecution Service was asked in August 2009 to consider a file of evidence in relation to an allegation of Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH) upon Jamie Merrett by one of the nurses who looked after him.
“Mr Merrett is tetraplegic and breathes via a ventilator requiring him to have round the clock care. We were asked to consider a charge under Section 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 against Violetta Aylward, a registered nurse, who, while she was looking after Mr Merrett, switched off his ventilator and was unable to turn it back on. Part of the evidence considered was CCTV footage which captured the incident.
"The evidence in this case was carefully reviewed. We could prove that serious harm had been caused as a result of the suspect’s action, however, we could not prove that Ms Aylward intended to cause harm or that her actions were reckless, which is the required mental element for the offence. We therefore decided that there was insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction.
"The Crown Prosecution Service informed the victim, his family, and the suspect of our decision at the time.”
• Media reported that the CPS we had been provided with further files in the case of black cab rapist John Worboys and decided to take no further action because it was not in the public interest to prosecute the case. The reports said that there could be 102 victims in this case. Our position is that we have seen no new material since the trial and we actually considered somewhere between 35 and 40 case files at the time. The arrangement with the police is that if there is strong evidence of allegations of serious offences we would consider any new files.